While reading this morning...
I stumbled across this from the WHO
"WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
The greater the number, the higher the CT's (cycle thresholds), the lower the viral load- All my readers know that!
We've talked about this issue several times since March of 2020. A couple of flashbacks below.
THC Interview:David Crowe Coronovirus/Covid19- The Risks, Testing and Treatment
In August : Was the PCR Test Meant To Detect A Virus?
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis,therefore,health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information."
An aid for diagnosis. Clearly the PCR test is NOT, nor has it ever been a diviner of diagnosis. Despite the presentation.
diviner- forecaster, seer or prophesier also god like force for diagnosis
In order that there be a correct diagnosis the result must be considered in combination with multiple other factors such as patient history, clinical observation etc
Clearly the PCR test is NOT the ultimate authority. Though it's been deigned as such. So why do these tests continue to set the tone or standard for and justify every crime against humanity that is being presently enacted?
More questions?
Let's go back a bit further to when the WHO officially altered their status on the PCR test. Check screenshot below from WHO document titled- Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Specifically the corrigenda of this document-
Read what was deleted and then subsequently inserted on September 11/20
Delete:Virus neutralization assays are considered to be the gold standard test for detecting the presence of functional antibodies. These tests require highly skilled staff and BSL-3 culture facilities and, therefore, are suitable for use in routine diagnostic testing.
Insert: Virus neutralization assays are considered to be the gold standard test for detecting the presence of functional antibodies. These tests require highly skilled staff and BSL-3 culture facilities and, therefore, are unsuitable for use in routine diagnostic testing.
That's quite a change. The gold standard for detecting the presence of functional antibodies went from being suitable for use to be unsuitable for use. Why? Was the WHO intending to make it more difficult, for some reason, to measure the presence of functional antibodies in an individual, as well as in the populace? In order to downplay the idea of naturally occurring social immunity (herd immunity) being much more widespread then the vaccine pushers would like?
Anybody have any thoughts or ideas on why this change might have occurred?
Related:
We Had the Vaccine the Whole Time- A So Called Vaccine Awaiting a So Called Pandemic?