Got this video from the Discovery Channel on Youtube
I was watching it earlier today and the talking head made TWO very interesting statements.
They kind of jumped out at me
It is very obvious Turkey is being destabilized. And NATO is fully aware and participating in this through their symbiotic proxies KurdIShIS.
I've written on this for almost a year now.
We have the spook/journalists.
But, could it be true that NATO would still protect Turkey if the Islamic State became the government of Turkey? I find that an incredible statement. And a mind boggling possibility. Though it's entirely plausible given the agenda.
How could NATO media spin such an occurrence?
I was watching it earlier today and the talking head made TWO very interesting statements.
They kind of jumped out at me
1:19: "Turkey has also been implicated in contributing funds and fighters to ISIS, although no direct connection has been proven"Video below:
2:37: "But should ISIS actually depose the Turkish government from within, as unlikely as that may be, they will still be protected under the NATO mutual defense clause"
It is very obvious Turkey is being destabilized. And NATO is fully aware and participating in this through their symbiotic proxies KurdIShIS.
I've written on this for almost a year now.
Kurd/ ISIS Symbiosis- The impending destruction of Turkey
Pt.2- Kurd/ ISIS Symbiosis- The impending destruction of Turkey
We have the spook/journalists.
VICE 'journalists'- Journalists as Spooks: Same old, same old
Two Vice News journalists arrested in Turkey
But, could it be true that NATO would still protect Turkey if the Islamic State became the government of Turkey? I find that an incredible statement. And a mind boggling possibility. Though it's entirely plausible given the agenda.
How could NATO media spin such an occurrence?